![]() They may be more feature-limited, but they have much more editing capability than Picasa or iPhoto. Upon export, the instructions in the edits are then applied to the original file-you always have access to all your original image data), and are generally easier to learn than a tool like the Gimp or Photoshop. These types of editors are non-destructive (i.e., the original RAW file is left intact, and edits are saved separately. Photoshop, then three open source packages to consider are RAWTherapee, darktable (no Windows version, only Linux/OSX), and photivo. If, however, you'd prefer something more workflow-oriented that looks more like a RAW conversion tool such as Lightroom, vs. dcraw adds raw capability to the Gimp, so you do need to use them in conjunction. Tutorials are plentiful out on the interwebz. The GIMP is the open-source alternative to Photoshop, and has a very deep and sophisticated feature set, with quite a bit more control than you could find in Picasa. The Panasonic S1 is not only the best-built 24MP full-frame mirrorless camera on the market (though it is heavy), it keeps up with the best of its competitors in most respects. "Best" depends on what you're looking for in post-processing software, but a few of the more popular open source packages you could look at using would be:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |